GOOD LEADERSHIP

The Science of being good: can moral psychology teach US to lead a good life?

Darcia Narváez is a distinguished psychologist and researcher known for her significant contributions to moral psychology and education. In our interview, we examine Darcia's neo-Kohlbergian approach that shifts from Kohlberg's universal rights-based morality, based on cognitive development, to a view of moral development as a continuous, relational, and context-dependent process. Her model defines levels of development using moral schemata and emphasizing the intricate relationship between personality, identity, and character for moral sensitivity, reasoning, identity, and action. We also delve into her triune ethics metatheory, which highlights the influence of three distinct neurobiological systems on ethical behavior, and her research on "evolved nests". Thereafter, we discuss the pivotal role of education and the significance of schools and teachers in shaping moral development. Darcia's practical work emphasizes fundamental human needs that underpin ethical growth, focussing on  connection with nature, self-directed play, nurturing and healing practices, trust, community imagination, and embodied morality. Join us for an enlightening conversation on how moral psychology can foster a more just and compassionate worldand perhaps a newfound appreciation for that tree on your next journey home!

Jump to




BEHIND the interview

Why is the interview important? Who are we talking to?

DISCOVERING THE DIALOGUE WITH

Darcia Narvaez

We were compelled to interview Darcia for three significant reasons, each rooted in the key themes of her research and publications.

Firstly, her work on Larry Kohlberg's stage model of moral development was of particular interest. Darcia introduces the concept of moral schemata, moving away from Kohlberg's rigid linear stages to a more fluid, context-dependent, and socially influenced developmental process. In her framework, she associates moral development with moral identity and distinguishes a "conventional" level of development characterized by conformity to social norms, where moral judgments are based on societal expectations, rules, and the approval of others. Postconventional thinking, on the other hand, relies on autonomous moral thinking and personal conscience, challenging societal conventions perceived as unjust. She suggests that specific patterns of conceptual interpretation and action become "chronic" as individuals progress morally. While her perspective offers a highly compelling and more integrated view of moral development, we were concerned of the potential risks of relativism and the loss of Kohlberg's strong philosophical foundation, especially in his (contested) levels 5 and 6, where moral reasoning is based on Social Contract, Individual Rights and Universal Ethical Principles. We also sought to explore her measures for moral development, such as the Defining Issues Tests and Intermediate Concepts Measure (ICM), and, of course, to resolve the classic "Heinz dilemma" (see below)!

Secondly, Darcia's extensive fieldwork in moral education piqued our interest. She developed a comprehensive skills framework for teaching morality in schools, as part of Minnesota's Community Voices and Character Education Project. We recognized the potential linkage between her delineation of moral development levels and Dreyfuss's recent expansion of his renowned skills acquisition framework to encompass practical wisdom. We aimed to gain a better understanding of how she selected and defined skills and skill levels, with an eye toward leveraging her insights for our own work in leadership development. Here our exploration directly links to our discussions on virtue literacy with Scott Parsons. Additionally, we had reviewed the research on Kohlberg's Just Community schools and sought insights from Darcia's work to inform our evolving model for the moral develompent of governance, processes and structures within organisations.

Lastly, Darcia's research on neurobiology and the exploration of embodied morality was intriguing for us. By examining the intricate connections between brain function, evolutionary development, and moral behavior, she offers a fresh perspective on how our biology influences our capacity for compassion and ethical decision-making. Her emphasis on a biosocial ecology of development, early attachment and the "evolved nest", as well as the roles of our bodies, emotions, and social connections in shaping our moral character, also connects with our exploration of psychodynamics and the importance of holding environments, identity workspaces and containment, as discussed with Simon Western and Gianpiero Petriglieri. Moreover, her work on individual and communal imagination and the concept of a transpersonal transrationality offers a compelling extension of Aristotelian "ergon" and links to our discussions about relational ontology and purpose, for example with Gert Biesta, and about the common good, for example with Alejo Sison. One challenge we intended to explore was the potential risk of environmental determinism in her suggestions of direct linkages between behavioral patterns acquired in early childhood and, for example, political behavior in adults.

KEY LEARNING GOALS (click LIGHTBULB to see the INQUIRY MAP)

  • What is the Kohlbergian stage model for moral development? How do the stages differ? Which are the potential challenges of the model, and what is the evidence supporting especially levels 5 and 6? How successful has the application of the model in Just Community schools been?
  • How does the neo-Kohlbergian approach developed by Rest/Narvaez differ? How is Postconventional moral thinking defined, and how does it link to the Four-component model and Blasi's theory of Moral Identity? How can moral development be measured by DIT, DIT2, ICM and other tests? What are the results?
  • How does Darcia develop her Triune Ethics Theory and Evolved Nest? How does it link with Indigenous wisdom and evolutionary theory? What are the potential challenges?

✿ ABOUT DARCIA NARVAEZ

Darcia Narváez is a highly regarded psychologist and researcher recognized for her significant contributions in developmental psychology, moral psychology, and indigenous psychology. She holds the title of Professor Emerita of Psychology at the University of Notre Dame, Indiana, US and serves as the President of Kindred World while hosting EvolvedNest.org. Narváez's academic journey began with a B.A. in Music and Spanish from the University of Northern Colorado, followed by a Master of Divinity from Luther Northwestern Seminary in 1984, and a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Minnesota.

She is an active member of numerous prestigious professional organizations, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the Association for Psychological Science (APS), the American Educational Research Association (AERA), and the American Psychological Association (APA), among others. Her extensive academic career has included fellowships and roles at esteemed institutions, such as the Institute for Educational Initiatives at the University of Notre Dame, Faculty Affiliate at the Program for Interdisciplinary Educational Research (ND PIER), and Faculty Affiliate at the Aretai Center on Virtues in Genoa, among other affiliations.

Narváez's impactful body of work includes several important books and publications, including "Neurobiology and the Development of Human Morality," "Embodied Morality," "Handbook of Moral and Character Education," "Personality, Identity, and Character," and "The Evolved Nest." Her research articles have significantly advanced the fields of moral psychology, developmental psychology, and education. She has received numerous accolades, including being recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2021 and receiving the Expanded Reason Award in 2017 for her book "Neurobiology and the Development of Human Morality." Narváez has played active editorial roles in various academic journals, served as the Editor of the Journal of Moral Education, and contributed to many other editorial boards.

Outside of academia, Darcia Narváez is deeply committed to community service, participating in advisory boards for organizations like Applied Mindfulness, Your Whole Baby, and ULEAD. She has also been actively involved in the St. Joseph County Breastfeeding Coalition and various boards and advisory groups dedicated to child well-being, moral development, and environmental justice. Narváez's media presence is substantial, with her insights on morality, parenting, human development, and Indigenous wisdom featured in renowned outlets such as the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, National Public Radio, and more. Her significant influence is underscored by her recognition as one of the top 2% of scientists worldwide in a recent analysis of 8 million scientists.  

Critical concepts for this session

Moral psychology is a field of study in both philosophy and psychology. Historically, the term "moral psychology" was used relatively narrowly to refer to the study of moral development. Moral psychology eventually came to refer more broadly to various topics at the intersection of ethics, psychology, and philosophy of mind. Some of the main topics of the field are moral judgment, moral reasoning, moral sensitivity, moral responsibility, moral motivation, moral identity, moral action, moral development, moral diversity, moral character (especially as related to virtue ethics), altruism, psychological egoism, moral luck, moral forecasting, moral emotion, affective forecasting, and moral disagreement. Today, moral psychology is a thriving area of research spanning many disciplines, with major bodies of research on the biological, cognitive/computational and cultural basis of moral judgment and behavior, and a growing body of research on moral judgment in the context of artificial intelligence.

Moral development focuses on the emergence, change, and understanding of morality from infancy through adulthood. The theory states that morality develops across a life span in a variety of ways and is influenced by an individual's experiences and behavior when faced with moral issues through different periods of physical and cognitive development. Morality concerns an individual's reforming sense of what is right and wrong; it is for this reason that young children have different moral judgment and character than that of a grown adult. Morality in itself is often a synonym for "rightness" or "goodness." It also refers to a specific code of conduct that is derived from one's culture, religion, or personal philosophy that guides one's actions, behaviors, and thoughts.

Lawrence Kohlberg’s stages of moral development, a comprehensive stage theory of moral development based on Jean Piaget’s theory of moral judgment for children (1932) and developed by Lawrence Kohlberg in 1958. Cognitive in nature, Kohlberg’s theory focuses on the thinking process that occurs when one decides whether a behaviour is right or wrong. Thus, the theoretical emphasis is on how one decides to respond to a moral dilemma, not what one decides or what one actually does. The framework of Kohlberg’s theory consists of six stages arranged sequentially in successive tiers of complexity.

The production of a moral act entails four inner psychological processes termed the Four Component model. These are (1) moral sensitivity, (2) moral judgment, (3) moral motivation, and (4) implementation. Analyzing the production of moral behaviour in terms of the Four Component model is useful for explaining various failures in moral behaviour, for providing a framework for organizing various research/theoretical traditions in the psychological study of morality, for understanding various theoretical controversies in psychological literature, and for planning moral education interventions.

Kohlberg’s work in moral judgement has been criticised by many philosophers and psychologists. Building on Kohlberg’s core assumptions, we propose a model of moral judgement (hereafter the neo-Kohlbergian approach) that addresses these concerns. Using 25 years of data gathered with the Defining Issues Test (DIT), we present an overview of Minnesota’s neo-Kohlbergian approach, using Kohlberg’s basic starting points, ideas from Cognitive Science (especially schema theory), and developments in moral philosophy.

The Defining Issues Test is a component model of moral development devised by James Rest in 1974. The University of Minnesota formally established the Center for the Study of Ethical Development as a vehicle for research around this test in 1982. The Defining Issues Test is a proprietary self-report measure which uses a Likert-type scale to give quantitative ratings and rankings to issues surrounding five different moral dilemmas, or stories. Specifically, respondents rate 12 issues in terms of their importance to the corresponding dilemma and then rank the four most important issues. The issue statements that respondents respond to are not fully developed stances which fall on one side or another of the presented dilemma. Rather, they are conceptualized as fragments of reasoning, to which respondents must project meaning. Meaning is projected by means of moral reasoning schemas. A schema is a mental representation of stimuli that has previously been encountered, which allows one to make sense of newly experienced, but related, stimuli. So, when a respondent reads an issue statement that both makes sense to them, as well as triggers a preferred schema, that statement is given a high rating and ranking. Conversely, when a respondent reads an issue statement that is either construed as nonsensical or overly simplistic, the item receives a low rating. Patterns of ratings and rankings reveal information about three specific schemas of moral reasoning: the Personal Interests Schema, the Maintaining Norms Schema and the Postconventional Schema.

Empirical studies show that reasoning and emotion only moderately predicted moral action. Scholars, such as Blasi, began proposing identity as a motivating factor in moral motivation. Blasi proposed the self model of moral functioning, which described the effects of the judgment of responsibility to perform a moral action, one's sense of moral identity, and the desire for self-consistency on moral action. Blasi also elaborates on the structure of identity and its connection to morality. According to Blasi, there are two aspects that form identity. One aspect focuses on the specific contents that make up the self (objective identity content), which include moral ideals. The second refers to the ways in which identity is subjectively experienced (subjective identity experience). As the subjective side of identity matures, the objective side tends to lean towards internal contents like values, beliefs, and goals, rather than external identity contents like physical aspects, behaviors, and relationships. A mature subjective identity yearns for a greater sense of self-consistency. Therefore, identity would serve as a motivation for moral action.

The triune ethics theory (TET) is a metatheory in the field of moral psychology, proposed by Darcia Narvaez and inspired by Paul MacLean's triune brain model of brain development. TET highlights the relative contributions of biological inheritance (including human evolutionary adaptations), environmental influences on neurobiology, and culture to moral development and reasoning. TET proposes three ethics that are the foundation or motivation for all ethics: security (or safety), engagement, and imagination. They differ not only in the recency of evolutionary development but also in their relative capacity to override one another.

Every animal has a nest for its young that matches up with the maturational schedule of the offspring (Gottlieb, 1997). Humans too! The Evolved Nest (or Evolved Developmental Niche; EDN) refers to the nest for young children that humans inherit from their ancestors. It's one of our adaptations, meaning that it helped our ancestors survive. Most characteristics of the evolved nest emerged with social mammals more than 30 million years ago. Humans are distinctive in that babies are born highly immature (only 25% of adult-sized brain at full-term birth) and should be in the womb another 18 months to even resemble newborns of other species! As a result, the brain/body of a child is highly influenced by early life experience. Multiple epigenetic effects occur in the first months and years based on the timing and type of early experience. Calling these components the Evolved Developmental Niche, Narvaez and colleagues add to the list soothing perinatal experience (before, during, after birth) and a positive, welcoming social climate.

Never miss an interview! Just go to YouTube and subscribe to our Good Organisations channel for all upcoming interviews and all our new videos!


GETTING STARTED

A Resource Kit to launch your explorations

Darcia's homepage at the Department of Psychology at Notre Dame University featuring an overview of her curriculum and research

A good overview of Darcia's publications by citation

Many podcast interviews

Website of the Evolved Nest project

Social outcomes, such as empathy, conscience, and behavioral self-regulation, might require a baseline of psychological wellbeing. According to Triune Ethics Metatheory (TEM), early experience influences the neuropsychology underlying a child's orientation toward the social and moral world. Theoretically, a child's wellbeing, fostered through early caregiving, promotes sociomoral temperaments that correspond to the child's experience, such as social approach or withdrawal in face-to-face situations. These temperaments may represent an individual's default sociomoral perspective on the world. We hypothesized that sociomoral temperament emerges as a function of wellbeing and would be related to social outcomes measured by moral socialization and self-regulation. Further, we hypothesized that sociomoral temperament would mediate the relationship between wellbeing and social outcomes.

There are over 7.5 billion people on the earth. Some people take it as a sign of evolutionary success. But imagine if at the next birthday party you attend, the tallest person took everything --all the cake, punch and presents for himself. It would not be much of a party. Similarly, when one species takes over a biocommunity for itself, it’s not much of a community. This is what the dominant industrialized capitalist culture has done on the earth. This dominant culture is behaving like a weed species. Weed species appear for a while but they disappear when a more cooperative species comes along that fosters the wellbeing of the biocommunity (Naess & Rothenberg, 1989). The dominant human culture has won the species race, its apparent aim with its propaganda of human separation from and superiority to Nature (Moore, 2016). Only there is no race. And it has been lost. 

Phronesis or practical wisdom is an idea often presumed to have emerged from the ancient Greeks and thus discussions tend to focus on their views. Yet practical wisdom was not just the purview of ancient Greek thought but was discussed among Axial age philosophies (e.g., Confucius), and it is apparent, though not transcribed, in ancestral-style societies (noncivilized) ( Lee and Daly 2005 ) and among First Nation peoples of the Americas (e.g., Deloria 2006 ). The perspective presented here suggests that, perhaps because of inadequate attention to these other traditions, there are gaps in most scholarly discussions of phronesis. The latter traditions include two critical ingredients of phronesis not typically attended to in discussions of ancient Greek traditions: the grounding or biosocial ecology of development and the expansive imagination or worldview of transpersonal transrationality

Rest and Narvaez developped the four component of model of moral development. This model included moral sensitivity, moral judgment, moral motivation, and moral character. Based on this model, when making a decision, we must ensure that we take into consideration not only how this decision will affect us but also have the sensitivity to understand how this decision will impact others. Second, we must have enough knowledge of the subject to understand if the decision, in the context of the subject, is a "right." Third, we must have the internal motivation to follow through and, finally, have the character to do what we have determined is correct.

Kohlberg’s work in moral judgement has been criticised by many philosophers and psychologists. Building on Kohlberg’s core assumptions, we propose a model of moral judgement (hereafter the neo-Kohlbergian approach) that addresses these concerns. Using 25 years of data gathered with the Defining Issues Test (DIT), we present an overview of Minnesota’s neo-Kohlbergian approach, using Kohlberg’s basic starting points, ideas from Cognitive Science (especially schema theory), and developments in moral philosophy.

In this chapter we explore the resources of social-cognitive theory to conceptualize moral personality. In our view social-cognitive theory is an important source of insights for understanding moral functioning, although it is rarely invoked for this purpose. Indeed, the introduction of social-cognitive theory to the moral domain has at least three integrative possibilities (Lapsley & Narvaez, in press). First, it opens moral psychology to the theories, constructs, and methodological tactics of social-personality research, with its potential for yielding powerful accounts of character, identity, and personality. Second, it opens a broader array of options for conceptualizing moral rationality, including the possibility that much of our moral functioning is tact, implicit, and automatic (Narvaez & Lapsley, in press). Third, it locates the study of moral functioning within a mainstream of psychological research on cognition, memory, social cognition, and modern information-processing.

The Minnesota Community Voices and Character Education Project (CVCE) was a collaborative project among researchers and educators that provided both a systematic and holistic view of character as a set of skills, in accordance with ancient and modern views, and a novice-to-expert view of character cultivation. The model provided maximum flexibility for local implementation while using rigorous evaluation methods in measuring effects. An overview of the project is presented, including the research-based framework and the evaluation of program outcomes.

Debating whether or not teachers should teach values addresses the wrong question. Education already is a values-infused enterprise. The larger question is how to train teachers for positive character formation. Two teacher education strategies are presented in this article. A “minimalist” strategy requires teacher educators to make explicit the hidden moral education curriculum and to reveal the inextricable linkage between best practice instruction and moral character outcomes. The “maximalist” approach requires preservice teachers to master a tool kit of pedagogical strategies that target moral character directly as a curricular goal. To this end, the Integrative Ethical Education model outlines five steps for moral character development: supportive climate, ethical skills, apprenticeship instruction, self-regulation, and adopting a developmental systems approach.

In recent years “flourishing” has been a topic of interest to multiple fields, particularly economics (eg measuring well-being;  philosophy and psychology. We hope the papers in this special section will inspire you to expand your understandings of flourishing, inclusive of different perspectives. I make some preliminary remarks with a few distinctions and suggest a definition according to appropriate baselines, a definition that brings into the circle of concern non-humans.

In the past century, both philosophy and psychology have reawakened to virtue, but mostly independently. How can the disciplines integrate their approaches to virtue scholarship? We examine three key assertions from virtue ethics in light of empirical research in psychology:(1) that virtue is realized in habits and dispositions,(2) that virtue is realized by a mean between extremes (doctrine of the mean), and (3) that virtue relates to human flourishing and the telos. We discuss selected contemporary psychological programs–structural examinations of personality, expertise, and developmental studies–and consider their strengths and limitations in light of philosophical concerns and as they relate to virtue generally and specifically in science. We finish by suggesting areas for future fruitful inquiry at the intersection of virtue ethics and psychology.

Recently, intuitionist theories have been effective in capturing the academic discourse about morality. Intuitionist theories, like rationalist theories, offer important but only partial understanding of moral functioning. Both can be fallacious and succumb to truthiness: the attachment to one’s opinions because they "feel right," potentially leading to harmful action or inaction. Both intuition and reasoning are involved in deliberation and expertise. Both are malleable from environmental and educational influence, making questions of normativity—which intuitions and reasoning skills to foster—of utmost importance. Good intuition and reasoning inform mature moral functioning, which needs to include capacities that promote sustainable human well-being. Individual capacities for habituated empathic concern and moral metacognition—moral locus of control, moral self-regulation, and moral self-reflection—comprise mature moral functioning, which also requires collective capacities for moral dialogue and moral institutions. These capacities underlie moral innovation and are necessary for solving the complex challenges humanity faces.

The language of moral virtue comes easily to most of us. When we think about the moral, what comes to mind are certain dispositions to do the right thing at the right time for the right reason. We have in mind the possession of certain traits that conduce to living the life that is good for one to live. To be honest, generous, fair-minded, compassionate, resolute in the service of justice—these and other virtues are the ambition that we have for ourselves and for our children. Indeed, how to raise children of good moral character is a pressing concern of parents and educators alike. We hope children come to exhibit traits of character that are praiseworthy and reflect credibly on their formation as a person. Indeed, we would be disappointed if our children developed only a glancing acquaintance with the virtues.

Further essays and materials from other authors

This paper describes the development and preliminary testing of an intermediate concept measure (ICM) of moral thinking for adolescent populations. First proposed by Rest and Narvaez (1994), intermediate concepts are described as more context specific than moral stages defined within the Kohlberg tradition, but are more abstract than assessments of codes of conduct. The process of developing the adolescent ICM is described and data are presented to provide initial support for the measure. Results indicate that the adolescent ICM can distinguish age educational groups across high school and individuals who are acting out in school achieved significantly lower scores than all other students. In addition, ICM scores are related to Defining Issues Test scores providing preliminary support for the claim that both measures assess the moral domain. Coupled with the respectable psychometric properties of the measure, these findings support the adolescent ICM as a measure of moral thinking in adolescent populations and as a potential outcome measure for character education programmes.

The just community approach aims to promote moral development and moral responsibility through the organization, practices and culture of the school itself. The just community approach to schools emerged in 1974 with the opening of the Cluster School, a small school-within-a-school located in Cambridge Massachusetts. Out of this experiment and others that followed, Kohlberg, co-authors, Oser, Lind, and other colleagues, as well as the teachers and students within the different just community programs themselves developed the just community approach to moral education as we have it today.

This article introduces a special section on moral development. We claim that the field is now undergoing a resurgence of theoretical and methodological innovation after the eclipse of paradigmatic moral stage theory. Although research on prosocial development, moral emotions, and social domain theory has sustained interest in moral development, recent additional trends have contributed to its resurgence. This includes research in neuroscience, sociobiology, and social psychology; broad interest in moral-character education and virtues; and the appearance of recent handbooks and special journal issues. We review 3 broad possible future themes (early development, self and personality, and culture) of moral development research and introduce a set of new contributions in this special section as examples. (

This paper provides a brief overview of Rest's (1983) conception of the important processes that contribute to effective moral decision making, summarizes efforts to design and assess moral education programs based on Rest's Four-Component Model, and describes new directions in the assessment of moral judgment development that are specifically directed toward professional ethics education. Based on preliminary studies, we recommend that, in addition to measuring each of the processes in Rest's model, educators design profession-specific measures of moral concepts that better reflect the content of professional ethics education. Labeled intermediate concepts measures, these assessments attend to concepts that are more specific than the abstract moral schemas tested by Kohlbergian measures of moral judgment and more general than concrete codes of professional ethics.

Selected published works

Interested in Leadership? Here is our Top 100 selection of the most important books for professional leaders of all times.


the socratic dialogue

Live video recording and podcasts

Explanations, artefacts and references from the interview

Jean William Fritz Piaget (9 August 1896 – 16 September 1980) was a Swiss psychologist known for his work on child development. Piaget's theory of cognitive development and epistemological view are together called "genetic epistemology". Piaget placed great importance on the education of children. As the Director of the International Bureau of Education, he declared in 1934 that "only education is capable of saving our societies from possible collapse, whether violent, or gradual". His theory of child development is studied in pre-service education programs. Educators continue to incorporate constructivist-based strategies.

Piaget's theory of cognitive development is a comprehensive theory about the nature and development of human intelligence. It was originated by the Swiss developmental psychologist Jean Piaget (1896–1980). The theory deals with the nature of knowledge itself and how humans gradually come to acquire, construct, and use it. Piaget's theory is mainly known as a developmental stage theory. He believed that children of different ages made different mistakes because of the "quality rather than quantity" of their intelligence. Piaget proposed four stages to describe the development process of children: sensorimotor stage, pre-operational stage, concrete operational stage, and formal operational stage. Each stage describes a specific age group. In each stage, he described how children develop their cognitive skills. For example, he believed that children experience the world through actions, representing things with words, thinking logically, and using reasoning.

Lawrence Kohlberg (October 25, 1927 – January 19, 1987) was an American psychologist best known for his theory of stages of moral development. He served as a professor in the Psychology Department at the University of Chicago and at the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University. Even though it was considered unusual in his era, he decided to study the topic of moral judgment, extending Jean Piaget's account of children's moral development from 25 years earlier. In fact, it took Kohlberg five years before he was able to publish an article based on his views. Kohlberg's work reflected and extended not only Piaget's findings but also the theories of philosophers George Herbert Mead and James Mark Baldwin. At the same time he was creating a new field within psychology: "moral development".

The Heinz dilemma is a frequently used example in many ethics and morality classes. One well-known version of the dilemma, used in Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development, is stated as follows: A woman was on her deathbed. There was one drug that the doctors said would save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was charging ten times what the drug cost him to produce. He paid $200 for the radium and charged $2,000 for a small dose of the drug. The sick woman's husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money, but he could only get together about $1,000 which is half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said: “No, I discovered the drug and I'm going to make money from it.” So Heinz got desperate and broke into the man's laboratory to steal the drug for his wife. Should Heinz have broken into the laboratory to steal the drug for his wife? Why or why not?

Carol Gilligan (November 28, 1936) is an American feminist, ethicist, and psychologist, best known for her work on ethical community and ethical relationships. Gilligan is a professor of Humanities and Applied Psychology at New York University and was a visiting professor at the Centre for Gender Studies and Jesus College at the University of Cambridge until 2009. She is known for her book In a Different Voice (1982), which criticized Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development.

Martin Elias Peter Seligman (born August 12, 1942) is an American psychologist, educator, and author of self-help books. Seligman is a strong promoter within the scientific community of his theories of well-being and positive psychology. His theory of learned helplessness is popular among scientific and clinical psychologists. A Review of General Psychology survey, published in 2002, ranked Seligman as the 31st most cited psychologist of the 20th century. Seligman is the Zellerbach Family Professor of Psychology in the University of Pennsylvania's Department of Psychology. He was previously the Director of the Clinical Training Program in the department, and earlier taught at Cornell University. He is the director of the university's Positive Psychology Center. Seligman was elected president of the American Psychological Association for 1998. He is the founding editor-in-chief of Prevention and Treatment (the APA electronic journal) and is on the board of advisers of Parents magazine.

The vagus nerve, also known as the tenth cranial nerve, cranial nerve X, or simply CN X, is a cranial nerve that carries sensory fibers that create a pathway that interfaces with the parasympathetic control of the heart, lungs, and digestive tract. It comprises two nerves—the left and right vagus nerves—but they are typically referred to collectively as a single subsystem. The vagus is the longest nerve of the autonomic nervous system in the human body and comprises both sensory and motor fibers. The sensory fibers originate from neurons of the nodose ganglion, whereas the motor fibers come from neurons of the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus and the nucleus ambiguus. The vagus was also historically called the pneumogastric nerve.

In psychology and cognitive science, a schema (pl: schemata or schemas) describes a pattern of thought or behavior that organizes categories of information and the relationships among them. It can also be described as a mental structure of preconceived ideas, a framework representing some aspect of the world, or a system of organizing and perceiving new information, such as a mental schema or conceptual model. Schemata influence attention and the absorption of new knowledge: people are more likely to notice things that fit into their schema, while re-interpreting contradictions to the schema as exceptions or distorting them to fit. Schemata have a tendency to remain unchanged, even in the face of contradictory information. Schemata can help in understanding the world and the rapidly changing environment. People can organize new perceptions into schemata quickly as most situations do not require complex thought when using schema, since automatic thought is all that is required.

Reflective equilibrium is a state of balance or coherence among a set of beliefs arrived at by a process of deliberative mutual adjustment among general principles and particular judgements. Although he did not use the term, philosopher Nelson Goodman introduced the method of reflective equilibrium as an approach to justifying the principles of inductive logic (this is now known as Goodman's method). The term reflective equilibrium was coined by John Rawls and popularized in his A Theory of Justice as a method for arriving at the content of the principles of justice.

The Minnesota Community Voices and Character Education Project (CVCE) was a collaborative project among researchers and educators that provided both a systematic and holistic view of character as a set of skills, in accordance with ancient and modern views, and a novice-to-expert view of character cultivation. The model provided maximum flexibility for local implementation while using rigorous evaluation methods in measuring effects. An overview of the project is presented, including the research-based framework and the evaluation of program outcomes. Multivariate analysis of variance was conducted on gain scores from pre-post student assessments of climate and individual variables, comparing program schools with a comparison school. Results were significant for program schools who implemented with more breadth and focus.

Implicate order and explicate order are ontological concepts for quantum theory coined by theoretical physicist David Bohm during the early 1980s. They are used to describe two different frameworks for understanding the same phenomenon or aspect of reality. In particular, the concepts were developed in order to explain the bizarre behaviors of subatomic particles which quantum physics describes and predicts with elegant precision but struggles to explain. In Bohm's Wholeness and the Implicate Order, he used these notions to describe how the appearance of such phenomena might appear differently, or might be characterized by, varying principal factors, depending on contexts such as scales. The implicate (also referred to as the "enfolded") order is seen as a deeper and more fundamental order of reality. In contrast, the explicate or "unfolded" order includes the abstractions that humans normally perceive

The toll in death, suffering, and displacement caused by conflicts engaging groups defined by ethnicity, nationality, religion, or other social identities has reached staggering proportions over the past decade. With expertise in research and intervention, psychologists have critical contributions to make to more fully understanding and more effectively confronting this distressing global phenomenon. The authors focus on the parallels between the core beliefs of individuals and the collective worldviews of groups that may operate to trigger or constrain violent struggles. On the basis of a review of relevant literatures, 5 belief domains--superiority, injustice, vulnerability, distrust, and helplessness--are identified as particularly important for further study.

In designing a recent study, Notre Dame Professor of Psychology Darcia Narvaez wanted to test the possibility of promoting the sense of ecological attachment that was inherently part of many pre-industrialized societies and is still practiced by First Nation peoples. An experiment that was part of the study, now published in Ecopsychology, showed that students reported increased mindfulness towards the environment after performing ecological attachment tasks like contemplating nature, or practicing environmental preservation tasks like recycling and limiting electricity usage. Only the tasks that had students communing with nature increased feelings of connection to it.

KEY INSIGHTS FROM THE INTERVIEW FOR OUR INQUIRY

Here you can find the most memorable insights from our interview, related to our three inquiry questions. Simply select from the drop down menu on the right -->

The development of Moral Psychology
  • The modern field of moral psychology began with Piaget and was highly influenced by moral philosophy. This means that you focus on reasoning as being the pinnacle aspect of being a human being. What distinguishes us from other animals is to explicitly consciously reason and make decisions based on our experiences that bubble up into our verbal understanding. That inspired Kohlberg, who tried to make it a more systematic stage-sequence of moral development, which was primarily moral judgment development or reasoning development.
  • Both of them focused on how people verbalize their understandings. Now, the Neo-Kohlbergian perspective is that we mostly make decisions, and this is based on cognitive science, we mostly make decisions tacitly with our subconscious and not with the conscious ego driving us. In the neo-Kohlbergian view, there also isn't just one stage you apply at a certain point whenever you've reached that ability, that stage of thinking. You use multiple stages depending on the circumstance. So, the Neo-Kohlbergian is much more flexible than Kohlberg's scheme, which was rigid in terms of stair-step development of reasoning.
  • Before the focus on reasoning, […] a lot of people thought it was habits. The Kantian view was that you had to make children obey their parents, to be heteronomous first. You punish them into obedience so that they can learn to control their passion, and their self-interest, and become autonomous later. Now, this is very backwards. If you know anything about indigenous cultures, which I study these days, it's backwards, you break the child's spirit, and then you think they're later going to be autonomous and responsible. That's not how it developmentally works. But that was the perspective of habits mattering more than reasoning.
  • If you're raised in a violent family, you learn that violence works well, right? But it doesn't really work so well outside of that violent family. So that's not a good environment for training up your intuitions. […] If you go back in time to Aristotle, particularly Mencius, a Chinese philosopher, they were not only focused on reasoning. The early experiences shape your sensibilities. They had a sense of this. They just didn't spell it out, which is what I'm trying to do these days. Both were focused more on humans. My work today is to include what we see in our deep history of how people are raised with a sense of relationship to the natural world. 
Four Components of Moral Action
  • The moral judgment or moral reasoning focus assumes that it doesn't matter what your emotions are. Pretty much anything except your reasoning and your decision and acting on that doesn’t matter. It leaves out most of our humanity. My late husband, Jim (James) Rest identified more components to moral behaviour than moral reasoning and judgment.
  • Sensitivity - you have to notice there's an issue. Notice there's someone in need that you're walking by. And then you make decisions about what the right thing to do is. Here, the right judgment comes into play, but that's not enough.
  • You have to be motivated. If it's a homeless person, you have to feel the responsibility to be involved in helping that person, for example. And in that moment, you have to be willing to set aside other priorities in order to help that person. So that's moral identity, moral focus, moral motivation, those kinds of things there.
  • But again, that's not enough either to complete the moral action. You have to be able to actually know what to do and what steps to take. You have to know how to carry forward to the end until it's completed, whatever that action is.
  • People can fail at any point; they can fail to notice, fail to make a good decision, fail to be motivated, and fail at carrying out the action. So all those things are important. 
Early life experiences
  • My work now is focused on early life experience and how that shapes those initial schemas for getting along with others and whether you have trust in the world. A key component of being able to live a responsible life on the Earth is to feel trust towards your caregivers.
  • In our ancestral environment, you would have all sorts of community experiences that enhance that trust towards the community and towards the natural world. And so that would build these larger macro schemas about how the world works. Now, if you're left, as a child to cry or left alone a lot, you're going to go into a different overall worldview than a child who's well nurtured and never left in distress. You're going to carry that forward and how you act in life. And we've created a lot of people who have a very transactional exchange orientation to the world because they think everything's scarce because everything was scarce when you were a baby.
  • Because if you're under-cared for in early life, you're going to be more likely to go into self-protection modes, rather than having the egalitarian social engagement mode as a dominant orientation. You'll be easily triggered into self-protectionism.
DIT and the “Heinz dilemma”
  • Well, remember that the test is about how you reason it's not what choice you make. It's the reasoning that matters. So, how many people are you taking into account? Are you taking into account just Heinz’s own self going to prison? Well, that's a very low level, right? Are you taking into account his concern for his wife? That’s a higher level. Are you taking into account the societal impact? That's a higher level. Are you taking into account the principles of honouring life? […] The reasoning itself matters.
  • But you have to be in the context, you have to have the boots on the ground, you have to have local knowledge. One of the problems with Western reasoning and modelling and abstract thinking, it's caused so much damage all over the world. William Easterly cites all these billions spent on trying to help these poor people over there. You come in with your model and your idea that they need a well, or they need this or that. But then you disrupt the whole society because you have no idea how all the things work together. So, you have to have an expert on the ground to guide you on exactly what is needed there and how to do it in a respectful way, or else you're disrupting, and you're disruptive.
  • An implicit attitude measure or an intermediate concept measure (ICM)? Yes, but again, that's semantic knowledge. That's your ego consciousness. Most people do not act from that perspective. They act from the subconscious, their automatic responses and their lived experience. […] We have to be careful with these measures. If you're going to put a student in a laboratory and test them, that's not real life.
Virtues
  • Virtues are applied in specific ways for particular situations. So again, this desire to have some grand abstracting capacity is a dangerous thing […]
  • Everything's contingent. That's why you need wise elders who are going to guide the young and understand how to apply virtues correctly […] We've been around for millions of years. And now for a few thousand years, we’ve thought that abstract thinking is the way to go.
  • Virtues are also indigenous. We wouldn't be here if our ancestors hadn't been virtuous, which was linked to survival. If you weren’t a cooperative member of society, you wouldn't survive. 

Earth community
  • The way I think about it today is that we have to be a well-functioning cooperative member of the earth community, not just the human community. Right now, we've forgotten all that. The dominant culture is very oriented to just humans only and treating everything else as a commodity, or as an […] or dumb or dead. But we live on a sentient planet. Everything has purpose and agency, even if we don't recognize it right now, even though the dominant culture dismisses all of that. So, I think that the primary purpose of being a member of the earth community is to be a cooperative member.
  • We all have to adopt an identity of being a member of the earth community. We're all members of the same community, as earth’s creatures. […] So, the identity aspect has to be shifted towards being more collective, more communal, and more connected.
Wellness-informed organisations
  • In the United States, it's becoming more and more acceptable to focus on a trauma-informed workplaces, trauma-informed schools, trauma-informed organizations. Understanding what triggers people and what people are coming to terms with in regards to their traumatized relational orientations. But that's not enough. We've got to be wellness-informed. And that's where the “evolved nest” comes in. You have to understand what people need to meet their basic needs. That means all throughout life, but especially in the early six years when the brain has been constructed by experience. So, it is not enough to trigger people, but you have to know how to enhance their well-being.
  • The evolved nest is needed by all of us throughout life. That means affectionate touch, not punishment, responsive relationships, self-directed play, nature connection, immersion, mentorship, and then routine or regular healing practices. We all get out of balance in our relationships or lose confidence or lose relationships with the natural world. We need to have regular, weekly perhaps, nurturing healing practices that are part of who we are. So, all these things should be integrated into any organization.
The good school
  • The Finnish schools are really good at promoting well-being. I think that's where you start. You meet the basic needs of the child. Children need to have autonomy and choice and not be pressured and pushed. In there, they get to select what they study, they get to play every hour, outside play is the best thing for children. The Evolved Nest includes play and nature connection, responsive relationships, and just ways of being in the world that actually help you flourish and grow as a child. Self-actualization should be the first priority. And I think the Finnish schools are doing this quite well.
  • In early life, you have to build trust […] but also a wider set of intelligence. Social intelligence, emotional intelligence, receptive intelligence. These are things in the States that kids are coming to school with missing. And there is little focus on receptive intelligence, which for me means the receptive to the communications of the natural world, and getting into your animal senses that are very intuitive and wise.
  • I think it would be good to not have testing. Finland doesn't test their students until they're in high school. Students in the States come from families that are stressed. It’s hard to learn in those stress modes. That’s why trauma-informed education is really important.
  • Teachers have to be educated about child development, and how children learn and not be oriented to wanting power. That teacher who wants power is not going to treat the children very well.
  • If you're just about information and passing tests, that's okay. But that's not what education should be. Education should be about self-transformation. It's not just a matter of semantic knowledge, as though that's how it's often treated. But that's why we're destroying the planet. The whole system is oriented to creating cogs in the machine of capitalism. 
Integrative ethical education - RAVES model
  • We've renamed it RAVES. The acronym helps you remember what the ingredients are. The raves model is an intentional moral education model. You don't let things accidentally happen. You intentionally set things up.
  • R: R stands for relationships you need with the students, especially young students. The teacher needs to have a secure attachment relationship with students. […] In those relationships, you have a way of feeling like you belong, that you have autonomy or choice, and you are able to make meaning. […] Classroom climate helps you feel like you're a member of a significant community that contributes to the world.
  • A: Key number two is apprenticeship. Learning in an expertise model way, from novice to expert. How you learn is you're exposed to the big picture, first, and then level two is you practice skills. The third level is you practice procedures, how to put those skills together. And then the fourth one is you practice implementing across contexts. And so that's A - apprenticeship model. That's how people learn. That's natural pedagogy.
  • V: V is for virtuous role models. You show them what virtue looks like in real life and introduce them to role models, and a lot of conversations, and experiences.
  • E: Then E is for ethical skills development. And those skills in the books we published in 2009, we have one for each of the four components I mentioned earlier. So ethical sensitivity, ethical judgment, ethical motivation, and ethical action.
  • S: S for self-monitoring self-actualization. The student has to take on their own moral development in the end. Just like any other education topic, you want the students to be able to manage without the teacher. That's the ultimate goal.
Academia
  • It's important to take up native science. One of the problems in the States with science today is that […] one study looks at some little, tiny outcome and then they declare that the evolution of millions and millions of years old doesn't matter. We are doing some experiment with a limited setting and variables and then interpretation, but generalizing to all humanity. That is a problem. 

Share the most popular quotes with your social media connections: just click + save picture + post!

Do you want to see ALL the best quotes from Leaders for Humanity? Here is our personal selection from all interviews so far (in PDF).


diving deeper

Unleash your curiosity and discover new insights

✿ Good Leadership

Further explorations about moral psychology and moral development

Kohlberg Revisited (Moral Development and Citizenship Education)

by Boris Zizek (Editor), Detlef Garz (Editor), Ewa Nowak (Editor)

Moral Development: Guide to Piaget and Kohlberg

by Ronald F. Duska, Mariellen Whelan

Personality, Identity, and Character: Explorations in Moral Psychology

by Darcia Narvaez (Editor), Daniel K. Lapsley (Editor)

Moral Development & Reality: Beyond the Theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman

by John C Gibbs

Moral Development and the Social Environment

by Georg Lind

Moral Development and Reality: Beyond the Theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt

by John C. Gibbs

The Oxford Handbook of Moral Development: An Interdisciplinary Perspective

by Lene Arnett Jensen
How to Teach Moral Competence

How to Teach Moral Competence

by Georg Lind
The EQUIP Program: Teaching Youth to Think and Act Responsibly through a Peer-Helping Approach

The EQUIP Program: Teaching Youth to Think and Act Responsibly through a Peer-Helping Approach

by John C. Gibbs, Granville Bud Potter, Arnold P. Goldstein
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion

by Jonathan Haidt
Moral Psychology, Volume 1: The Evolution of Morality: Adaptations and Innateness

Moral Psychology: The Evolution of Morality

by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Editor), Christian B. Miller (Editor)
The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology

The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology

by Manuel Vargas (Editor), John Doris (Editor)
The Emotional Construction of Morals

The Emotional Construction of Morals

by Jesse Prinz
The Moral Animal: Why We Are The Way We Are

The Moral Animal: Why We Are The Way We Are

by Robert Wright
Virtuous Emotions

Virtuous Emotions

by Kristján Kristjánsson
The Psychology of Good and Evil: Why Children, Adults, and Groups Help and Harm Others

The Psychology of Good and Evil: Why Children, Adults, and Groups Help and Harm Others

by Ervin Staub

Related blog posts

From Psychological Safety to Psychological Hope: Taking a Leap Beyond the “Comfort zone”

Psychological Safety relates, roughly speaking, to the belief that we shouldn’t be punished or humiliated for speaking up with our ideas, questions, concerns, or mistakes. Which, if you asked me, sounds pretty much like common sense. Fancy name apart — why did everybody jump on it as if it was the hottest thing since the invention of bread?
(6 min read)

Letting Go of Leadership -The Urgent Case for A Global Leadership Iconoclasm

Are you a good leader? In case you are emphatically nodding, how would you know? Regrettably, it has become increasingly difficult to discern what “good Leadership” actually means. Searching Google reveals a mind-boggling 148 million links to the term. Amazon hosts over 100,000 entries.
(9 min read)
Curious to see more from our inquiry? A good place to start is our blog with all recent leadership articles and posts.


CONTINUing YOUR JOURNEY

Explore all the popular interviews in this section